- the infinite being
- simple minds
- something else
- ideas
- material bodies
- epiphenomenon
- elizabeth is an epiphenomenon she doesn't play a role in the story
- minds can clearly cause themselves to do things
- how do bodies by producing ideas cause minds
- how does causality even occur?
- what is causality ?
- spinosa ends up saying that part of the issue is in the definition of the word substance
- in decartes principles he defines it a something completely independent of anything else
- god is constantly recreating the universe
- the issue becomes how many substances are there
- the only real substance is god
- spinosa takes decartes picture and the only substance is god
- god and matter are bits of the same thing
- for spinoza when i kick thing and it makes it the same as the sound it makes
- there is no time and space they are just causality
- this is the best of all possible worlds
- why bother with material objects they are doing nothing in the story
- for barkley all there are are ideas which are the visual and sensory feel
- if it is a congry of sensations there is nothing being sensed therefore it doesn't exist
- the ordinary person doesn't have a concept of material bodies
- john locke - set the british ball rolling by being an imericist
- impiricist- someone who things all of our knowledge comes from our experience
- hume is coming from the ideas of barcly and locke mainly
- hume thinks Barcly is crazy but right
- hume says we clearly think there are material objects
- we think that objects continue to exist when they aren't looked at
- we think that the tree doesn't depend on me preconceiving it now and is independent of me
- deosexmachina - don't kill your son and make him a priest ( god from the machine) ie something being brought in to save the day
- what makes us think objects are continuous?
- the vulgar - the common person
- hume and barcly thing they are defending the view of the vulgar
- humes point is tha we think things exist independent without humans
- we have a prepensity that objects continue to exist when we don't look at them
- material bodies cause our ideas
- once you recognize that there are material objects becasue of a propensity to believe there are material objects
- what is it to be a skeptic?
- to be a skeptic means to say I don't know
- hume is going to look at 2 questions
- do my ideas, the object i see when i am no perceiving them ?
- do objects continue to exist when i am not seeing them ?
- are objects independent of being percieved?
- substance
- sensation
- reason
- imagination
- there is nothing that the sense faculty says that 2 sensations are the same thing
- there is nothing in your sensory faculty that doesn't come from sensation
- given that everyone's ideas different the only thing you can do is that there is a similarity between idea A and idea B but it doesn't tell you they are the same object just similar ideas
- there is a relation between your first idea and your second idea
- certain things are followed by certain other things
- the only thing that can be causing this is a strong disposition from our memory that ther are these types of things but there is no reason to think that
- what you see when someone kicks the table is sensory and auditory
- you believe that by kicking the table he caused the noise but there is nothing in your sensation that has cause
- we believe the noise happens because the one sort of event is commonly followed by the other
- there is no rational cause of induction
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment